Difference between revisions of "Visualize, don't show, don't tell - The Why and How of Design Fiction"
(Edited attribution) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/c/c3/1984first.jpg https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/62/BraveNewWorld_FirstEdition.jpg | https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/c/c3/1984first.jpg https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/62/BraveNewWorld_FirstEdition.jpg | ||
| − | ''First edition of 1984 and Brave New World, both retrieved from [/en.wikimedia.org/ Wikimedia]'' | + | ''First edition of 1984 and Brave New World, both retrieved from [https://en.wikimedia.org/ Wikimedia] '' |
Both books are capable of creating a world in which we are inevitably asked to question our own and both are using the adagium ''Show, don't tell''. This article uses three student design fiction objects to show that, while these books might be the literary equivalent of design fiction objects, design fiction allows for a more open-ended equivalent while still creating a strong vision. Design fiction isn't creating a story of a world, it is creating a world itself, in which we allow ourselves to mirror our own world and thereby questioning it. | Both books are capable of creating a world in which we are inevitably asked to question our own and both are using the adagium ''Show, don't tell''. This article uses three student design fiction objects to show that, while these books might be the literary equivalent of design fiction objects, design fiction allows for a more open-ended equivalent while still creating a strong vision. Design fiction isn't creating a story of a world, it is creating a world itself, in which we allow ourselves to mirror our own world and thereby questioning it. | ||
Revision as of 03:49, 6 February 2017
Introduction
Since the inauguration of Donald Trump as the 49th president of the United States, a lot of fans of George Orwells 1984 (or Orwellians as they like to call themselves) have discussed how Orwells perspective on the manipulation of truth, and the consequences resulting from that act, are portraying a vision of the near future. However, the Orwellian perspective is contested by the Huxley perspective<ref name="The Guardian"> [1], Andrew Postman, "My dad predicted Trump in 1985 – it's not Orwell, he warned, it's Brave New World", in The Guardian.</ref> in which not only the System World is questioned because of its desire to postpone the truth, but also the Life World is called to action to question its own information-consuming behaviour described in Brave New world.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/c/c3/1984first.jpg https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/62/BraveNewWorld_FirstEdition.jpg
First edition of 1984 and Brave New World, both retrieved from Wikimedia
Both books are capable of creating a world in which we are inevitably asked to question our own and both are using the adagium Show, don't tell. This article uses three student design fiction objects to show that, while these books might be the literary equivalent of design fiction objects, design fiction allows for a more open-ended equivalent while still creating a strong vision. Design fiction isn't creating a story of a world, it is creating a world itself, in which we allow ourselves to mirror our own world and thereby questioning it.
Background of the assignment
Sixty third year students were asked to create a design fiction object after using Kees Dorsts Reframe Method based on The Urban Agenda of Rotterdam. Students took one of the ten different Challenges, analysed them and reframed them into an image of a Rotterdam in 2030.