|
|
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | {{Article | + | {{Article}} |
| − | |Article===Intersectional Feminism==
| |
| − | Feminism is "the belief in the social, political, and economic equality of the sexes" according to dictionary Merriam Webster ([https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/%20feminism 1893]). Considering that this definition originated during first wave-feminism in the late 19th century ([https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%20First-wave_feminism First-wave feminism, 2020]) but since we are the time of fourth wave-feminism now, it seems overdue to revise it, as the role of women in society has changed drastically over the past 130 years.
| |
| − | | |
| − | A term that appears increasingly in the recent discourse of feminism is intersectionality. Coined by civil rights advocate and law professor Kimberlé Crenshaw in 1989 ([https://youtu.be/lEeP_3vmdBY Blaque, 2019]), it describes the idea that an individual can be subject to different forms of discrimination at the same time. Therefore these forms of discrimination should not be treated as separate issues but need to be addressed in regard to each other.
| |
| − | Crenshaw references the case of DeGraffenreid vs General Motors; a legal battle where a group of Black women tried to sue General Motors for discriminating against them. The court found the company not guilty because they employed women as well as Black people, only that all the women were white and all Black people were men. The court did not consider looking into the employment of Black women specifically ([https://youtu.be/lEeP_3vmdBY Blaque, 2019]).
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | {{#evt:service=youtube|id=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEeP_3vmdBY&t=2s}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | As we see, people’s identities exist at different intersections of oppression and privilege. Therefore, feminism cannot and must not be ''not'' intersectional. There is no hierarchy in equality, so we cannot make the fight for it a hierarchical matter.
| |
| − | Hence I propose a new definition of feminism: "the belief in the social, political, and economic equality of all genders that recognizes the fact that different forms of oppression and privilege can impact individuals at the same time".
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | ==Indigenous Ways of Living==
| |
| − | "To have a connection to this place, to have a connection to this land, to have a connection to one another" - that is how Jay Odjick of the Kitigan Zibi Anishinabeg community describes being indigenous ([https://www.cbc.ca/news2/interactives/i-am-%20indigenous-2017/odjick.html Jay Odjick, 2020]).
| |
| − | A similar notion is expressed through the Quechua term ''sumak kawsay'', or ''buen vivir'' (as it is commonly known in South America today). It means "living in plenitude, knowing how to live in harmony with the cycles of Mother Earth, of the cosmos, of life and of history and in balance with every form of existence in a state of permanent respect" (Demos, 2016).
| |
| − | | |
| − | With the colonization of indigenous land and culture came the colonization of ''sumak kawsay''. Not only did European colonizers displace indigenous people and stripped them of their culture but they also destroyed the balance of sensitive ecosystems that indigenous people lived in harmony with for centuries. Indigenous people’s mindset that kept those ecosystems alive; the belief that humans are a part of nature and have a symbiotic relationship with it, was seen as savage and primitive. This exoticization of nature justified the resource exploitation of mother earth for the colonial settlers’ own financial gains. Nature had been colonized by them, too (Demos, 2016).
| |
| − | | |
| − | We can still find the legacy of colonialism in our culture today, whether it is in the privatization of spaces, the resource exploitation of nature and human labor through corporations, or the patenting of biological matter (Demos, 2016).
| |
| − | | |
| − | One powerful decolonial practice is counter cartography. It is based on the observation that maps are tools to maintain power structures as a map is produced by one or a small group of individuals with a certain world view that is inevitably reflected in it. They also put ownership, rights, and social norms on the natural environment. Hence maps cannot exist outside of power structures (kollektiv Orangotango+, 2018).
| |
| − | Counter cartography gives people the opportunity to fight those power structures by baring them open and setting a framework for opportunities for change on their terms (kollektiv Orangotango+, 2018). This practice is an especially powerful tool for indigenous communities, as maps have been historically used against them. The following keynote by Hindou Oumarou Ibrahim ([https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3d_UsYgt1c TEDx, 2020]) gives an insight into the use of counter cartography and shows how we can work together with indigenous peoples to prepare communities for the consequences of climate change.
| |
| − | | |
| − | {{#evt:service=youtube|id=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3d_UsYgt1c}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | ==Cosmopolitics==
| |
| − | The thought behind cosmopolitics, according to feminist philosopher and chemist Isabelle Stengers, is that decisions must take place in the presence of those who will bear their consequences (Haraway, 2016). This refers to the idea of the commons.
| |
| − | Both Rebecca Solnit and Silvia Federici, both feminist writers, deal with this topic in several of their works.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Solnit explores the connections between the structural discrimination of marginalized groups and power elites and the response to disasters. She claims that we can witness the power of community, especially after disasters, when the public organizes themselves in order to help each other ([https://bombmagazine.org/%20articles/rebecca-solnit/ Taylor, 2009]). Their ego becomes less important when it comes to the fight for survival and they tend to use a common-ist approach to disaster response. Institutional authorities, on the contrary, often fail in those situations. They imagine that not the public is in danger but it is also a source of danger, leading to disaster response in destructive ways in order to protect their property. This result is what Solnit calls "elite panic“ ([https://bombmagazine.org/%20articles/rebecca-solnit/ Taylor, 2009]). She says that we need a different view on human nature that goes against the current notion that humans are inherently bad because that only plays into the narrative that authoritarian power elites cultivate ([https://bombmagazine.org/%20articles/rebecca-solnit/ Taylor, 2009]).
| |
| − | | |
| − | Federici examines the role of women when it comes to recreating the commons in her work. She claims that capitalism appropriates the feminist agenda by exploiting women’s wish for autonomy in order to integrate them into the capitalist system which totally goes against equality and therefore against the commons ([http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CDf0NDNfWEQ The People's Forum NYC, 2019]). In poorer communities, however, women are on the front lines of recreating the commons by commoning what she calls reproductive activities ([https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCmJcPkpI98 The Laura Flanders Show, 2019]), such as cooking, gardening, taking care of garbage, etc, i.e. all activities that ensure the continuation of human life. Federici was able to witness this herself when visiting communities in South America, in areas where the state does not take care of the people. She shares an anecdote of a woman asking her what her community in the United States is like. When she responded that these kinds of communities do not really exist in the US, the woman reacted in shock and wondered who would take care of Federici in situations of emergency. Federici concludes that capitalism uses debt to attack community and solidarity relationships which makes it harder for individuals to confront the state ([https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCmJcPkpI98 The Laura Flanders Show, 2019]). Therefore, we need to redefine wealth, value, and social relations in order to regain decision-making power.
| |
| − | }} | |
| | {{YearSelector}} | | {{YearSelector}} |
| | {{License selector}} | | {{License selector}} |
